Negative and positive Androgyny and their Relationship with Psychological Health and Well-Being

Negative and positive Androgyny and their Relationship with Psychological Health and Well-Being

A different type of rating the brand new Prolonged Private Attributes Survey (EPAQ) was utilized to assess this new constructs out of negative and positive androgyny. Brand new EPAQ are applied to 196 mature gents and ladies; the answers was in fact categorized to the a differentiated androgyny. High differences was in fact received ranging from positive and negative androgynous someone since the better as the ranging from positive and negative women and positive and negative masculine anyone into the a set of methods off mental health insurance and well-becoming. These types of conclusions keep the validity and you can electric away from recognize androgyny on negative and positive kinds of intercourse part title.

Records

Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self confidence due to the fact a purpose of manliness in men and women. Log of Consulting and Logical Therapy, 47, 783-785.

Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, G., Thompson, Letter. (1981). A keen Australian Gender Character Measure. Australian Log out of Therapy, 33, 169-183.

Baril, G., Elbert, N., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, G. (1989). Are androgynous managers extremely better? Group and Organisation Education, 14, 234-249.

Bem, S. (1977). With the utility from solution methods on evaluating out-of psychological androgyny, Record out-of Contacting and you can Health-related Mindset, 45, 196-203.

Boswell, H. (1997). The fresh transgender paradigm change into the free term. In the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Intercourse merging (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

Cheng, C. (1999). Gender character differences in sensitivity to your determine from help availableness to your anxiety. Log out of Personality, 67, 439-467.

Fey, W. (1955). Greet from the anyone else and its particular relation to desired of self and you will others: An effective revaluation. Journal off Abnormal and you will Personal Therapy, 50, 274-276.

Environmentally friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). The fresh appeal of sex sort of attributes from the various other dating profile: Androgynous services are prominent at all. Record off Personality and you may Personal Psychology, 20, 244-253.

Heilbrun, A. (1981a). Intercourse differences in the functional linkage anywhere between androgyny, personal cognition, and ability. Record regarding Personality and you may Public Psychology, 41, 1106-1118.

Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). Short sort of the fresh Colorado Personal Conclusion List, a goal measure of worry about-value. Bulletin of your own Psychometric People, cuatro, 473-475.

Hoffman, Roentgen. (2001). New measurement regarding masculinity and femininity: Historical position and you may ramifications to possess therapy. Journal regarding Therapy and you can Invention, 79, 472-485.

Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). The fresh new recognition and you will translation from communications outcomes between continuous variables within the multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 467-478.

Jones, W., Chernovetz, Yards., Hansson, Roentgen. (1978). The latest enigma out-of androgyny: Differential implications for men and you can female. Journal regarding Contacting and you will Systematic Psychology, 46, 298-313.

Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The newest formulations getting sex opportunities and androgyny: A significant opinion. Diary off Clinical and you will Contacting Mindset, 45, 1101-1115.

Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Sex spots and you may decision making inside demographically diverse communities: A case to have reviving androgyny. Gender Spots, 34, 49-663.

Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and you will expression out-of anger. Relationship which have gender role socialization, anxiety and psychological state working. Diary of Asking Mindset, 43, 58-165.

Lenney, Age. (1991). Intercourse opportunities: The new measurement off manliness, womanliness, and you can androgyny. In J. Robinson, D. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Steps regarding identity and you can public mental attitudes (pp. 573-660). North park, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.

Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An excellent., Butcher, J. (1981). The partnership anywhere between androgyny and you may personal indications from psychological well-becoming. Journal from Identification and you will Societal Mindset, forty, 722-730.

Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An effective., Butcher, J. (1983). Maleness, womanliness and you can androgyny viewed and you will assessed while the line of basics. Record regarding Identity and you will Social Therapy, forty two, 428-439.

s, C. (1989). Androgyny as well as regards to teenage emotional better-being: A look at the fresh literature. Gender Roles, 21, 25-341.

Could possibly get, A great., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you may coping when you look at the guys that have a beneficial managerial positioning. Southern area African Log regarding Mindset, twenty seven, 244-249.

Mead, B., Ignico, A. (1992). Kid’s sex composed thinking out-of physical working out: Outcomes and you may implications. Perceptual and you can Engine Skills, 75, 1035-1013.

Nowicki, S., Duke., M. (1981). The newest Nowicki-Strickland Life time Locus off Manage Scales: Build validation. In the H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Search towards the locus away from manage create (Vol. dos, pp. 16-43). Nyc: Informative Force.

O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you will low-stereotypic gender role characteristic and choices orientations, gender title and you may psychological variations. Journal off Personality and you may Public Psychology, 58, 134-143.

Pearson, J., Cooks, L. (1995). Gender and power. In the P. M. Kalbfleisch Yards. J. Cody (Eds.), Sex, strength, and you will telecommunications inside individual matchmaking (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Robinson, J., Razor, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Strategies out-of identity and social psychological thinking. North park, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Flower, A., Montemayor, R. (1994). The partnership ranging from sex character direction and sensed self-proficiency in male and female adolescents. Sex Spots, 31, 579-595.

Russell, G., Antill, J. (1984). An Australian gender-character scale: Even more psychometric data and you may correlations with thinking-esteem. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.

Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, M. (1991). Violence, gender part procedures and Kohut’s mindset of your worry about. Sex Spots, twenty-five, 41-161.

Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology since a function of sexual positioning, sex, belief, and you may characteristic classes into the lasting dyadic matchmaking. Record regarding Identification and you may Social Mindset, 47, 983-1002.

Get single blog post

Shaver, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, M., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you can accessory security: A few relevant models of max personality. Identity and you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 582-597.

Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and you may successful variation along the expected life among Japanese people. Journal out-of Hereditary Mindset, 158, 389-401.

Skoe, Age. (1995). Sex character positioning and its own link to the introduction of label and you can ethical think. Scandinavian Record regarding Psychology, 36, 235-245.

Spence, J. (1984). Manliness, femininity, and you can gender-relevant qualities: A conceptual investigation and you can criticism regarding most recent lookup. Advances inside Experimental Identity Search, thirteen, 1-97.

Spence, J. (1999). Three decades off intercourse research: Your own chronicle. Inside W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you will stereotypes into the society: The new gender science regarding erican Mental Association.

Spence, J., Buckner, C. mature women for free (2000). Important and you may expressive faculties, trait stereotypes, and you can sexist attitudes: Exactly what do they denote? Therapy of females Every quarter, twenty four, 44-62.

Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Holahan, C. (1979). Bad and good elements of mental manliness and you can womanliness and their relationship to self-records out of neurotic and you will acting-out behavior. Diary of Character and you can Public Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.

Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). The private Services Survey: A way of measuring gender role stereotypes and maleness-womanliness. JSAS List out of Picked Documents when you look at the Mindset, 4, 43-49.

Risk, J. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and instrumentality into the real world configurations: Another type of perspective on the advantages of androgyny. Intercourse Roles, 37, 541-564.

Taylor, Meters., Hall, J. (1982). Psychological androgyny: An assessment and reformulation of one’s ideas, procedures, and results. Mental Bulletin, ninety five, 347-366.

Western, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Creating gender. Within the Meters. Kimmel (Ed.), The newest gendered neighborhood viewer (pp. 131-149). Nyc: Oxford College or university Press.

Whitley, B. (1983). Intercourse role direction and you will care about-esteem: A significant meta-analytical remark, Diary out of Identification and Personal Mindset, forty two, 765-778.

Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (in press). Popular and you will undesired androgyny: A medicines on the twenty-earliest 100 years. Diary out of Sex Training.

Wulff, Yards., Steitz, J. (1999). A path model of the partnership between community indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and you may notice-admiration. Perceptual and you may Engine Experiences, 88, 935-940.

Tags: No tags

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *